Post 27 Part III: Get in the Game...Push Back
Officials are not omniscient and get pulled into many different directions. The only way to get action is to get in front of them...show them the problem and give them a solution.
Ensuring Elected Officials Oath’s
As I posted earlier, I began by looking into my local sheriff to see if there was a valid Oath of Office on file. It seems like there was one. So, the sheriff of Ada county is a legally elected and properly sworn in to his position.
This inspired me to look to determine the status of other elected officials.
Brad Little (Governor)
Scott Bedke (Lt. Governor)
Phil McRane (Secretary of State)
Raul Labrador (Attorney General)
Based on the requirements under Idaho law and statute, all the above Oaths of Office are properly signed, dated, witnessed and sworn for the particular office. At least in Idaho the Sheriff of Ada County and the Governor, Lt. Governor, Secretary of State and the Attorney General are legally seated.
Again, all it took was a request email to the Secretary of State and copies of the Oaths of Office were provided to me in under 5 days. Unlike Lisa McGee, her request for the Oaths of Office for members of the Biden administration appointees, took weeks and months (when she got anything at all).
Moving Up & Down the Chain of Responsibility
After getting some preliminary evidence that the elected officials were legally seated, I proceeded to reach out to the attorney general (AG) for the state of Idaho, Raul Labrador:
Sir,
I am bringing to your attention that cabinet-level members of the administration of President Joseph R. Biden are illegally seated in the positions of federal office. I believe, based on the evidence that I have seen and to the best of my abilities, that several individuals are impersonating federal officials and have caused harm to the citizens in the State of Idaho. The impersonators used the powers as federal officials, which have resulted in deaths, loss of property and violations of Constitutional rights for the citizens of Idaho. Under current Idaho Laws, the following are charges that require consideration for filing:
A. Impersonation: The impersonator could be charged with a crime related to impersonating a public servant or law enforcement officer. Idaho Code § 18-3005 and 18-3126 may address impersonation of a public servant.
B. Fraud: If the impersonator used deception to harm individuals or obtain resources, charges related to fraud may be considered. Idaho Code § 18-2403 addresses fraudulent activities.
C. Racketeering: The listed individuals are in violation of Idaho Code § 18-7804 (c) which may also involve violations of the Idaho Code.
D. Assault: If the impersonator's actions resulted in physical harm to individuals, charges related to assault or battery might be applicable under Idaho criminal laws (Idaho Code § 18-901, § 18-903).
E. Conspiracy: If there was collaboration or agreement with others in carrying out the impersonation and related activities, conspiracy charges might be considered. Idaho Code § 18-1701 addresses conspiracy.
F. Terrorism: Under Idaho Code § 18-8103 the listed members in the QW writ may also be charged under this statute.
Mr. Xavier Becerra (along with Mr. Mayorkas, Mr. Blinkin and other listed in the Quo Warranto in the attachment to this email) is not legally sworn in and has no valid Oath of Office affidavit on record. This was discovered by Lisa McGee after pursuing Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests to verify that affidavits of the Oaths of Office of the officials in cabinet positions were present and correct. Mr. Becerra has no valid Oath of Office affidavit as is required under 5 U.S. Code § 3332. I refer the AG to the Writ of Quo Warranto submitted by Lisa McGee in this email attachment. Additional information can be gotten by reaching out to Mrs. McGee’s lawyer.
a. Todd S. Callender, Esq.
i. Email: Todd@dradvocates.com
ii. Phone: (303) 228 – 7065 Ext 7068
AG Labrador, I charge you and your office with the duty to file charges against the following listed individuals, as the Idaho Code does not limit itself to State of Idaho officials and government employees.
Not bad, huh?
What do you think the response from the AGs office was to my request for charges?
Good morning Mr. Figueroa:
Thank you for contacting the Office of the Attorney General of Idaho with your concerns with members of President Biden’s cabinet and the findings of Ms. Lisa McGee. Your comments are very important, and the Attorney General appreciates your perspective on how to best represent Idahoans.
The members of the cabinet which you refer must have Congressional approval. We would encourage you to share your concerns with Senator Crapo and Senator Risch who have the power to investigate these allegations. For your convenience, I am adding the contact information below.
So, no reply to how he, the AG, could go after federal officials that have violated federal and state law. Some buck passing to avoid the work…or something else? I’ll get back to the AG later. The response was highly unsatisfactory.
But, in the spirit of good citizenship and wanting to exhaust all avenues for relief, I acceded to the suggestion of the honorable AG for the State of Idaho. I wrote to my Senators.
The Honorable Senator,
I have recently become aware that members of the Biden administration are in violation of federal law, specifically 5 U.S. Code § 3331-3332. 5 U.S. Code § 3332 is nondiscretionary and mandatory for all appointees and federal officials.
5 U.S. Code § 3331 - Oath of office, states:
“An individual, except the President, elected or appointed to an office of honor or profit in the civil service or uniformed services, shall take the following oath: “I, AB, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.”
5 U.S. Code § 3332 - Officer affidavit states:
“An officer, within 30 days after the effective date of his appointment, shall file with the oath of office required by section 3331 of this title an affidavit that neither he nor anyone acting in his behalf has given, transferred, promised, or paid any consideration for or in the expectation or hope of receiving assistance in securing the appointment.”
Several attempts (as documented in the Writ of Quo Warranto attached to this letter) to secure the required affidavit oath of offices for the listed individuals (listed below) have resulted in failures to respond or defective affidavits. Not one of the listed appointees have produced a compliant affidavit consistent with the applicable statutes. Either the affidavit(s) are nonexistent, wanting, defective or the appointee has failed or refuses to provide the mandated affidavit to hold their respective offices.
Not timely responded:
Alejandro Mayorkas – Failed to respond.
Xavier Becerra – Failed to respond.
Dr. Miguel A. Cardona – Failed to respond.
Gina M. Raimondo – Failed to respond.
Marty Walsh and Julie Su – Failed to respond
Kamala Harris – Failed to respond.
Antony Blinken – Two letters were received; the latest of which has sought more time.
Janet Yellen – Responded with official letter stating that she does not have a Signed and Notarized Oath of Office.
Pete Buttigieg – Responded with official letter stating that he doesnot have a Signed and Notarized Oath of Office.
Jennifer Granholm – Exchange of communications with a third-party contractor handling Granholm’s FOIA stating they are almost certain that she does not have a Signed and Notarized Oath of Office.
Defective Affidavit
Rochelle P. Walensky – Received letter and affidavit, however, Walensky fails to specify which position she was appointed; and is not properly notarized or sworn.
Merrick Garland – An affidavit was produced; however, Garland fails to specify the date when he was appointed; and is not properly notarized or sworn.
Lloyd Austin III – An affidavit was produced; however, the document is not properly notarized or sworn.
Demand for Action
I am requiring and charging you, as a duly elected Senator for the State of Idaho, with the responsibility to demand the production of these affidavits, as they need to be readily available and producible upon request. Ten days are more than sufficient for the offices of the listed individual to search and produce the requested documents, as there have been request made to them already.
If the documents are not presented or non-compliant, this is evidence that each Officers’ allegiance to the Constitution and commitment that all official acts conducted by them could potentially subject them to Treason for failure of adherence[1].
I require to be informed of the status of each request, as well as the actions that you will take if and when the affidavits are not produced or are found defective.
Very Respectfully,
Dr. Xavier A. Figueroa
Ok…my Senator’s have now been informed. Notice to Principal has been provided and evidence of a crime is in their hands.
Now, much of the language used in this letter came straight from the Writ of Quo Warranto that was filed on behalf of Lisa McGee by Kenneth W. Ferguson and Todd S. Calendar.
Mr. Calendar explained to me that they do not have a point of entry to deliver the writ to the DC circuit court, informing the Congress of these violations may not even raise an eyebrow.
Per a previous communication with Mr. Calendar:
Thank you for the note Xavier. Yes, I’ve thought about it and we’ve filed several whistleblower complaints along with the writ quo Warranto we filed with the US Attorney. In other words, we’ve been pretty active either serving documents or supporting others who have in congress. We’ve had tepid responses, if any. I’ve been involved in various undertakings in state and federal efforts with the legislatures including a full-on crusade in Texas, yet the best we’ve been able to accomplish is obtaining whistleblower protection through Senator Johnson’s offices - at least as it relates to our country. I’ve spent quite a bit of time educating other legislative bodies and I work closely with Andrew Bridgen of the UK Parliament.
Because our government appears to be a captured entity, I’ve had to focus efforts on any place that will hear me/us. I wish I could report better news.
I’d love to see you and a million like you serve charging papers of treason and misprision of treason on our govt officials. Undoubtedly this is the case. We’ve been attacked by our own governments (plural). The planners eliminated all avenues of redress.
So, as we can see, patriotic citizens have attempted to assert the rule of law on a lawless cabal of individuals that are using state and federal agencies as a criminal cartel and organization.
What is truly wrenching is that there are so few that are willing to fight and dig…even if just a little.
Is This A Private Fight or Can Anyone Join?
As you have seen, this is a public fight. Anyone can join and needs to join. As Mr. Calendar has pointed out, having more people filing charges against government officials is critical. It lets the system and the people involved in the conspiracy know that we are watching and willing to fight.
Currently, going to the Department of Justice to report a crime (5 U.S. Code § 3332) seems like a bad joke. But, in order to ensure that we are within our rights, we need to exhaust all avenues.
I recently sent in a FOIA for the DOJ Office of the Inspector General (the office responsible for inspecting the DOJ). I need to verify that the man in charge of the OIG (Mr. Michael E. Horowitz) has a valid of oath of office. If he does, then maybe a criminal complaint can be sent in.
Let me know if you have joined the fight.
Until next time. Tell a friend!
[1] Tucker’s Blackstone Vol. 1 Appendix Note B [Section 3] 1803 - If in a limited government the public functionaries exceed the limits which the constitution prescribes to their powers, every such act is an act of usurpation in the government, and, as such, treason against the sovereignty of the people.
Is there a signed and notarized oath for President Biden? It feels planned for them to not have taken oaths so they can perform unconstitutional acts- which they are doing.