It is best to debate the merits and deficiencies of published investigations in the open, without resorting to editorial backdoors to “clean the record”. Editorial retractions are unaccountable.
Share this post
Post 22: What the "Defenders of Science" Miss…
Share this post
It is best to debate the merits and deficiencies of published investigations in the open, without resorting to editorial backdoors to “clean the record”. Editorial retractions are unaccountable.