Post 29: Mommy...Where Do Public Health Emergencies Come From?
Well, Sweetie, when global predators, sociopaths and true-believers love their beliefs more than the truth - and they get together to War Game scenarios...
Dual Use Infrastructure: Detection and Deception
Recently, I was contemplating my navel and the recent spate of FOIA requests I sent out. For some reason, the exercise of demanding information that my state and federal agencies were required to provide to me, stimulated a thought: How do public health agencies detect POTENTIAL outbreaks when people are not getting sick (i.e. - showing symptoms, going to hospitals and/or dying).
Well, the CDC has helped to fund detection systems in waste water! Yup…wholesale poop-scooping and data mining to ensure “community safety”. An lo to my surprise, the waste water surveillance for infectious disease (WWSID) system has been in effect for the purposes of measuring community levels of pathogen presence for decades in the US and around the world.
So, why do we need to have a WWSID system in place?
Well, in the public health sphere, there are two major types of infectious disease surveillance systems, both with different requirements to detect a health event of concern. This information is based off of a recent review of WWSID1 globally.
Event-based infectious disease surveillance:
A health system capable of observing trends (cases with disease markers).
A population with access to that health system.
A system that can collect and transmit this data to officials.
Things to consider: Event-based surveillance misses (or over reports) any infectious disease transmission that is not captured by cases (or over sampled due to flawed testing), hospitalizations (induced by treatments or not), and deaths (induced by treatments or not).
Environmental-based pathogen surveillance:
A system or systems that monitor the potential presence of a disease pathogen by identifying/quantifying pathogens in the environment.
A system that circumvents human behavior and health systems, which reduces bias (questionable but it does decrease specificity), while still providing inferential information regarding risks (potential risk) to human health.
Indirect information on sampled pathogens using direct (electron microscopy/purification/cell culture growth) and indirect measures (PCR and antigen tests).
Near constant surveillance on community-level bacterial, chemical and toxicological release into waste water.
The environmental-based surveillance system is used to determine POTENTIAL outbreaks of a disease. It can provide a public health group with the ability to TARGET specific communities if a threshold in the surveillance system is reached.
That’s the tricky part - how do you determine the threshold (and which test(s) do you use?) and what pathogen needs to be looked at? If you have a catalog of pathogens (or drugs or toxins) that you can use to declare a public health emergency (due to laws you have built up over decades: see Bailiwick News), you have a ready-made excuse to legally take over a community - and impose any new rules you want.
You Find What You Look For
The CDC has a National Wastewater Surveillance System (NWSS) to monitor for Mpox (Monkey Pox) and COVID-19. On the CDC website there are some very impressive graphs and maps on where and what they look for:
But you have to be aware that all those points, which report on Monkey pox tests in WWS, ALL of them have NOTHING to report. All those points have zero (0) reports that show detection of Monkey pox RNA fragments. They are not testing for the actual virus but using PCR to DETECT a fragment of the Monkey pox DNA.
Same for the SARs-Cov-2 testing. At the website they plot a national average of the PCR tests and what they report. I am still trying to figure out what the Wastewater Viral Activity level actually means. The CDC has a description of the Methods that they use for deriving their scales but (honestly) they are utter horseshit. If you want to see how they use the nucleotide (DNA or RNA) copying system (called PCR) to “detect” pathogens from a soup of collected human waste, you can go here: CDC WWS Data Methods.
For the most part, all WWS methods have moved away from virus isolation (if you can call it that) and focused on using PCR systems. For the most part, the virus “isolation” technique requires that a waste water sample be prepared by a process2 that is similar to the process for detecting Polio virus after a vaccination campaign (see flow diagram below).
This process is fraught with a great deal of variability and contamination. The most it can do is detect the POTENTIAL presence of viral particles or surviving RNA/DNA fragment that can produce a positive PCR result. Cell culturing of the suspected viral particle collected uses a very unspecific measure called a cytopathic effect (CPE, cells showing a stress response under a microscope). Never mind the fact that contaminants (which may also cause CPE) are ASSUMED to have been removed. Unless low Ct values are used and highly specific PCR primers are validated, the results can be very unreliable. Even when positive, they cannot tell us even IF there is an active disease running through a community - HELL, most of the WWS systems pick up evidence of recent vaccination campaigns! If you are actively vaccinating with attenuated virus YOU WILL DETECT a virus in your waste water!!
Ebola!? What Ebola? Oh…That Ebola.
So what is the big deal about all this waste water surveillance? It keeps us safe and ahead of the curve, right? It provides a warning if there is an outbreak of something truly bad…right?
Let’s start by bursting some bubbles.
As reported on Jon Fleetwood’s substack the folks at Merck have made a vaccine against Ebola Zaire (ERVEBO). Now, thank God that the folks at Merck were sufficiently responsible and did not attempt to use an actual Ebola virus (a hemorrhagic virus with up to 80% lethality) as the vaccine. Let’s not kid ourselves - FDA might have approved it (dark humor, I know…but the track record makes you wonder).
Per the insert:
ERVEBO (Ebola Zaire Vaccine, Live) is a sterile suspension for intramuscular injection. ERVEBO is a live recombinant viral vaccine consisting of a vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) backbone deleted for the VSV envelope glycoprotein and substituted with the envelope glycoprotein of the Zaire ebolavirus (Kikwit 1995 strain). The vaccine virus is grown in serum-free Vero cell cultures. The virus is harvested from the cell culture medium, purified, formulated with stabilizer solution, filled into vials and stored frozen. When thawed, ERVEBO is a colorless to slightly brownish-yellow liquid with no particulates visible.
Yay, The ScienceTM!! The real kicker in all of this is another little aspect of the use of a live vaccine…replication in the body. Those that received the shot in the US - specifically in the Denver, Colorado health system - have a good chance of infecting people around them with ERVEBO virus. And shitting it into the sewer system…
Again, per the insert:
Shedding
Shedding of vaccine virus into the urine or saliva was evaluated in 359 participants enrolled in 8 clinical studies who were vaccinated with ERVEBO or lower dose formulations. Vaccine virus RNA was detected by RT-PCR in the urine or saliva of some participants at timepoints ranging from Day 1 through Day 14 postvaccination. In the 3 studies that assessed shedding at Day 28, no samples tested positive. In Study 6, 31.7% (19/60) of participants 12 months through 17 years of age enrolled in a substudy shed vaccine virus in saliva following vaccination. Viral shedding was greatest on Day 7 and declined thereafter, with no shedding detected after Day 28.
Vaccine virus RNA was detected by RT-PCR in vesicular fluid samples from some participants. In one participant, a sample collected 20 days after vaccination tested positive for vaccine virus RNA by RT-PCR.
So, what does that mean? In the case of a CDC WWS system in Colorado, if they use a PCR system that looks for the glycoprotein sequence of Ebola Zaire - they will find it in the sewer system.
Now, if I remember correctly, there is a provision in the new American Domestic Bioterrorism Program that is specific to Ebola?
Oh, yes - there is! Thank you, Katherine Watt (Bailiwick News):
1983/12/22 - President Reagan signed Executive Order 12452, listing communicable diseases subjecting citizens to forcible apprehension and detention under Health and Human Services Secretary’s quarantine authority through PHSA, 42 USC 264b, including "Cholera or suspected Cholera, Diphtheria, infectious Tuberculosis, Plague, suspected Smallpox, Yellow Fever, and suspected Viral Hemorrhagic Fevers (Lassa, Marburg, Ebola, Congo-Crimean, and others not yet isolated or named).” 48 Federal Register 56927
So, what does it take to trigger another lockdown? According to our Federal code, the Secretary of Health has very broad powers to declare a PHE - and there is no provisions to stop the PHE UNTIL THE SECRETARY SAYS SO. Hell, there just needs to be ANY excuse, from ANY health asshat official to trigger a PHE :
42 U.S. Code § 247d - Public health emergencies
(a)Emergencies
If the Secretary determines, after consultation with such public health officials as may be necessary, that—
(1)a disease or disorder presents a public health emergency; or
(2)a public health emergency, including significant outbreaks of infectious diseases or bioterrorist attacks, otherwise exists,
the Secretary may take such action as may be appropriate to respond to the public health emergency, including making grants, providing awards for expenses, and entering into contracts and conducting and supporting investigations into the cause, treatment, or prevention of a disease or disorder as described in paragraphs (1) and (2). Any such determination of a public health emergency terminates upon the Secretary declaring that the emergency no longer exists, or upon the expiration of the 90-day period beginning on the date on which the determination is made by the Secretary, whichever occurs first. Determinations that terminate under the preceding sentence may be renewed by the Secretary (on the basis of the same or additional facts), and the preceding sentence applies to each such renewal. Not later than 48 hours after making a determination under this subsection of a public health emergency (including a renewal), the Secretary shall submit to the Congress written notification of the determination.
If you are not paying attention, you can trigger a public health emergency (PHE) by being very sloppy in your analysis and your reporting. It only takes one health official in the US (at any level) to get the HHS Secretary to declare an emergency. The WWS system is a dual-use technology: it can generate “pandemics”. Especially if you have a vaccine that can generate a danger signal.
YOU’VE BEEN WARNED.
One Health To Rule Them All - The Rise of A New Flaming Eye of Sauron
In the last 5-10 years, the U.N., the W.H.O. and other assorted NGOs have been beating the drum for the need of a coordinated, global and centralized system to establish a One Health approach.
A critical component for the take over of public health via the W.H.O., the International Health Regulations and the Pandemic Preparedness Treaty (PPT) is the requirement to monitor both human and animal health.
The W.H.O. is big on zoonotic transmission into humans - the seasonal influenza injections and monitoring are a yearly thing, with regular reports of “deadly” new strains of flu just around the corner. In 2009, the swine flu was reported to be making the rounds and this new flu was being diagnosed at very high rates, associated with high morbidity and mortality. Sharyl Atkinson pointed out this little scamdemic when she was working with CBS news. In 2009, CDC was attempting to inflate the numbers of the BIG BAD swine flu. The CDC had ordered up a whopping (at the time) 40 million doses for H1N1 vaccine…but they were caught inflating the numbers.
So, in 2009, the CDC was chalking up “presumed” and “probable” H1N1 diagnoses in order to jab more people against an “epidemic” that at the time the HHS had no legal ability to declare an PHE. The story by Ms. Atkinson brought to a halt the program (in the Obama administration) that was urging “Persons who are uncertain about how they were diagnosed should get the 2009 H1N1 vaccine.”
Sound familiar?
The One Health initiative is a massive, global surveillance system that has been developed as a management strategy to steer the public health groups (in all global jurisdictions) to submit to a central authority.
The “The One Health Approach—Why Is It So Important?” article is explicit in the thrust of what they are attempting to implement (look at the publication date - Published: 31 May 2019- just right before the SARS-2/COVID-19 live exercise) :
“The term ‘One Health’ was first used in 2003–2004, and was associated with the emergence of severe acute respiratory disease (SARS) in early 2003 and subsequently by the spread of highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1, and by the series of strategic goals known as the ‘Manhattan Principles’ derived at a meeting of the Wildlife Conservation Society in 2004, which clearly recognized the link between human and animal health and the threats that diseases pose to food supplies and economies. These principles were a vital step in recognizing the critical importance of collaborative, cross-disciplinary approaches for responding to emerging and resurging diseases, and in particular, for the inclusion of wildlife health as an essential component of global disease prevention, surveillance, control, and mitigation…”
When you cast a wide enough net, you will catch something. All you need is a plausible scare or excuse to “protect the community”. In order to protect the world from emerging cooties (i.e. - pathogens of concern), you need to monitor all aspects of the environment - human, animal and agricultural. All you need is access to all health data and to ensure that all farming and environmental sensing is sent through a central screening system. Set the risk threshold low enough, you can call a PHE for just about anything.
Mommy!? What If I Don’t Want to Give Give Myself to A Public Health Emergency?
Right now - and please excuse the crude analogy - we are resisting an ongoing societal rape (if you have been a victim of rape - my heart goes out to you. I don’t use this analogy lightly - many of my loved ones are in harms way). The W.H.O. and the I.H.R. are in the process of forcing themselves onto us… They come in sheep’s clothing but are wolves set to consume us. None of the current Pandemic Preparedness Treaties are designed to protect us. They are there to steer power to an non-elected global board.
The analysis of an independent board of researcher at the University of Leeds, funded by the Brownstone Institute, revealed many features flaws of the current W.H.O. approach to pandemic “preparedness”:
“While pandemics occur, and will continue to do so, the analysis in this report strongly indicates that the urgency expressed in key global health policy documents regarding natural pandemic risk is exaggerated. Considerable public health harm may therefore accrue through inappropriate diversion of resources if time is not taken to ensure responses are appropriate and proportionate. While the risk of outbreaks due to human manipulation of potential pathogens is not addressed here, WHO, the World Bank and G20 proposals are clearly based on perceptions of natural risk, particularly from zoonotic spillover events. The recent COVID-19 pandemic, if considered of natural origin, appears as an outlier in the context of recent outbreak trajectory, rather than indicative of a trend. However, when weighed against other endemic and chronic disease burdens in standard metrics incorporating life-years lost, the mortality from COVID-19 will also overstate its relative impact.”
Fuck these monsters.
Until next time.
Call and annoy your legislators.
File lawsuits.
Make waves.
Hold those that swore an oath, responsible.
We still have the law on our side.
Remember, Nuremberg was an idealistic/subverted response to a genocide - but it provided a framework to get justice.
Wastewater Surveillance for Infectious Disease: A Systematic Review, Am J Epidemiol. 2023 Feb 1;192(2):305-322. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwac175.
Poliovirus detection in wastewater and stools following an immunization campaign in Havana, Cuba, International Journal of Epidemiology 2003;32:772–777. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyg185.
Your ‘Stacks should be required reading. Thanks.