Post 27 Part V: Duties of Citizens Require Not Giving Up and Demanding Action from Their Elected Officials
It also helps to have friends get in on the fun! If you are in other states, see what sort of reaction you get from your AG. Start engaging your legal system in your state and do not be afraid!
As part of my work to get traction at the state-level, I have been trying to engage my elected officials on the issue of the Oath of Office affidavit (see Post 27). I think we have a good chance of getting traction at the state level.
This is why AGs and Sheriffs are so important in our Constitutional Republic. When federal agencies are corrupted and weaponized, the state level powers MUST BE used to fight these corrupt forces. More will be discussed on subsequent posts but there needs to be more engagement and activity at the INDIVIDUAL citizen level.
If the state AG is corrupt (or not acting to uphold the state and federal Constitution), as may be the case with WA AG Ferguson, Sheriffs and district attorneys have broad authority to begin their own investigations. It is all about checks-and-balances that must be appropriately followed and executed. We must relearn the powers that we have as a sovereign people.
We have to keep in mind that we are in an active War and the coordinators of this War want us to react in a way that will allow them to use naked force to accelerate the implementation of their plan for digital domination. As brilliantly and succinctly stated in David Hughes ““Covid-19,” Psychological Operations, and the War for Technocracy”, they want chaos in order to implement their plans:
“The transnational ruling class now seeks to replace liberal democracy with technocracy. Historically, such fundamental sociopolitical and economic change has only been possible through world war. Thus, the global class war is synonymous with World War III, which, however, looks nothing like the two previous world wars, just as they did not resemble anything seen before (J. Corbett, 2020a). World War III is waged using the novel methods of Omniwar (see below), i.e. war waged across every domain, but clandestinely, so that the public does not recognise it as such. It amounts to a global counterinsurgency campaign, with dissidents replacing “terrorists” as the enemy using the infrastructure established through the “War on Terror” (cf. Valentine, 2017, p. 64). Deception is fundamental: the public must not get wise to what is happening, lest there be a surge in revolutionary activity. So far, physical fighting has not broken out, however, the largest psychological warfare operation in history—the “Covid-19” operation—has been waged against the public, and historically, psychological warfare serves as the prelude to physical war.”
So, don’t give them what they want.
Give them what we need. The Rule of Law.
Also, buy David A. Hughes a Coffee (https://buymeacoffee.com/dahughes/c/9367318)
The Ongoing Work at the State Level in Idaho
I’m not giving up on getting my AG to press some charges. There is waaay more that can be done to bring these ALLEGED traitors to justice.
Below is my follow up letter to AG Labrador. Feel free to copy and use in your attempts to engage your AG. Remember, the more people that follow up with the same or similar charge, the more likely it is to happen.
Office of the Attorney General
State of Idaho
RAÚL R. LABRADOR
Idaho’s 33rd Attorney General
Sir,
I am following up with you and your office on a matter of grave and ongoing concern. Attached, at the bottom of this letter, is the original correspondence that I delivered to your office in February of 2024. In your email reply to my original request, you suggested that I direct my concerns to the two Senators from Idaho.
I have done so.
Senator Crapo responded as follows:
“Thank you for your recent letter, which was read with a great deal of concern. However, the issues you outlined are legal matters and do not fall under the jurisdiction of a United States Senator. Additionally, due to the strict constitutional separation of the legislative and judicial branches of government, I cannot intervene in this matter.”
To say that I was disappointed by Senator Crapo’s response is to understate my feelings. I am well aware of the broad powers of Senators to investigate which made the dismissal of responsibility and accountability a slap in the face. The mere fact that Cabinet-level officials are seated without an oath of office affidavit (this is a material fact not at issue; Writ of Quo Warranto, Exhibits A-M)) indicates that the Senate confirmation process has NOT been completed. Although the Senate confirmed these Cabinet-level officials, it is only AFTER the confirmed officials complete their required 5 USC § 3331 duties (oath of office), that the confirmation is closed. As it stands, none of the individuals listed in the Writ of Quo Warranto are LEGALLLY seated and are impersonating government officials. Additionally, the members of the Senate (particularly our Idaho Senators) have abrogated their Constitutional duty.
I have yet to hear from Senator Risch, who I have attempted to contact directly and via email on three separate occasions. I requested both Senator Risch and Crapo (starting in March of 2024) to demand the Oaths of Office of the listed officials and have reached out, repeatedly, to spur action. None has been forthcoming.
As the Attorney General for Idaho state, you are charged with the duty of protecting the Constitutional right of the citizens. As I have been repeatedly informed by legal scholars and industry experts, there has been a well-constructed and coordinated creation of legal statutes that protect those individuals engaged in fraud and criminal activity at the federal level. At the federal circuit courts, the system is corrupted to a significant degree, making that process a draining endeavor and unlikely to succeed.
I would, respectfully, suggest a different approach to the ongoing issue.
The material facts are present. No completed and valid Oath of Office affidavit has been received by any requestor, to date on the listed Quo Warranto (Exhibits A-M). This is prima facie evidence, not a technicality, that the seated persons in the DOJ, HHS, DOD, DOE, DOT and the State Department (to name the top seats) have no LEGAL authority and NO statutory power.
An example of establishing relief for the citizens of Idaho would be as follows.
Mr. Becerra has been signing a continuation of the Public Health Emergency (PHE) law since 2021. This has allowed the continuation of the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) and for the continuation of legal coverage of the Pfizer and Moderna gene therapies that have been classified as counter measures, not vaccines. The current legal protection that the Department of Defense, Pfizer and Moderna have against liability is solely due to the EUA.
As Mrs. Sasha Latypova has informed you, there are several liability issues that are facing Pfizer, Moderna and DoD. The least of which are manufacturing standards, adulteration, and product liability. All can be tried civilly and criminally in Idaho state due to one simple fact: Mr. Becerra cannot legally extend or assume any of the rights, duties and responsibilities as Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS). Any and all orders, contracts and decrees issued by Mr. Becerra are null and void. That includes the Public Health Emergency declaration, which terminates the EUA that DoD, Pfizer and Moderna are covered under. There is no valid Oath of Office affidavit on record (see Lisa McGee Writ of Quo Warranto) and none has been forthcoming or presented in over 18 months. This is not an issue for the Senate (although they could act on it) but a factual issue that would render the actions of a state AG as lawful, legal and within their jurisdiction. There is no PHE and no ability to execute and EUA.
I urge you to contact other AGs in other states, as this issue is of concern to all citizens that could grant relief to families that are suffering due to side effects from the gene therapies. This would allow for a class action lawsuit to provide relief for medical and financial help. Again, Mr. Becerra may have been confirmed by the Senate but he is not duly appointed and active without the Oath of Office affidavit.
Approaching a lawsuit with the implicit knowledge of a missing or invalid oath of office can allow for the following actions:
1. Any lawsuit brought forth will require the HHS prove that the orders of Mr. Becerra to extend the PHE were legal. This would mean that they would need to present a valid Oath of Office affidavit. If no Oath of Office affidavit is presented, then under 5 USC § 3331 and 3332 he never assumed the office of Secretary of HHS.
2. A lawsuit against Pfizer and Moderna under Idaho law would allow you to seek civil and criminal penalties. Issues surrounding the Commerce Clause would be rendered invalid due to the lack of a legal PHE, which is the law that the mRNA injections function under.
3. Arrest warrants for the listed individuals in the Writ of Quo Warranto (coordinating with other states AGs), under state laws of impersonating government officials (additionally fraud, racketeering, assault, conspiracy and terrorism) would be highly impactful and not easily ignored.
AG Labrador, the listed issues are a state-level jurisdiction. I am sure that other state AG’s would be willing to coordinate with your office on this matter to widen the impact and achieve a greater effect and relief for each of their citizens, as well. You actions against the NACs (natutal Asset Corporations) have proven to me your capacity and capability to make bold, assertive and correct action to protect Idaho citizens.
I and others have exhausted legal means to seek relief at an individual level. This is now a state level concern that affects ALL citizens of this state, regardless of party affiliation, race, sex or religion. I am working with other citizens in Montana, Wyoming, Tennessee and Idaho to align the AGs to make this a top priority and a National concern, prior to the election.
I have attached a valid and complete Oath of Office affidavit (DOJ-OIG Michael E. Horowitz) for you to compare against the provided Oath of Office affidavits in the Writ of Quo Warranto. The Oath of Office affidavits are incorrect in the Writ (no capitalizations in the affidavits for Mrs. Walensky and Mr. Austin III) and do not have a seal.
AG Labrador, I charge you and your office with these actions, to seek relief for the citizens of Idaho.
Very Respectfully,
Until next time.
Get in the fight.
Tell a friend.
Get Up, Stand Up.
Don’t Give Up the Fight.